Lineage 1 Intro:

Lineage one now has four separate paper trail lines showing as a dna match:
  • 1a contains a representative of the line from Wanton Walls, and from one of the two Michigan families  believed to be related but with no paper trail (other than hints in old family letters). The project is still looking for a representative of the other Michigan family believed to also tie into this lineage.
  • 1b, that of William of Crail with two matching confirming representatives
  • 1c with a sole representative from the line of Thomas and Jane(SIMPSON)

On this page:

RUNCIMAN Lineage 1 - overall dna results
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
Hap3
9
3
3
9
0
1
9
/
3
9
4
3
9
1
3
8
5
a
3
8
5
b
4
2
6
3
8
8
4
3
9
3
8
9
-
1
3
9
2
3
8
9
-
2
4
5
8
4
5
9
a
4
5
9
b
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
7
4
3
7
4
4
8
4
4
9
4
6
4
a
4
6
4
b
4
6
4
c
4
6
4
d
4
6
0
Y

G
A
T
A

H
4
Y
C
A

I
I

a
Y
C
A

I
I

b
4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
C
D
Y
a
C
D
Y
b
4
4
2
4
3
8
5
3
1
5
7
8
3
9
5
-
S
1
a
3
9
5
-
S
1
b
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
4
0
6
-
S
1
5
1
1
4
2
5
4
1
3
-
a
4
1
3
-
b
5
5
7
5
9
4
4
3
6
4
9
0
5
3
4
4
5
0
4
4
4
4
8
1
5
2
0
4
4
6
6
1
7
5
6
8
4
8
7
5
7
2
6
4
0
4
9
2
5
6
5
Modal13221410131311141112112816898112316202812141515101019211415161834361210118151581210899122225151012121681324201313111211121211
David (R-1)
I1
13221410131311141112112816898112316202812141515101019211415161834361210118151581210899122225151012121681325201313111211121211
Jerry (R-2)
I1
13221410131311141112112816898112316202812141515101019211415161834361210118151581210899122225151012121681324201313111211121211
Jim (R-7)
I1
13221410131311141112112816898112316202812141515101019211415161834361110118151581210899122225151012121681324201313111211121211
Kevin (R-8)
I1
13221410131311141112112816898112316202812141516101019211415161834361210
Peter (R-12)
I1
13221410131311141112112817898112316202812141515111019211415161834361210118151581210899122225151012121681324201313111211121211
Jim (R-10)
I1
13221410131311141112112816898112316202812141515101019211416161834361210118151581210899122225151012121781324201313111211121211
Lines of George & Jennet (FINLAY) RUNCIMAN from Earlston/Lauder Berwickshire, and of William and Elizabeth (JAMIESON) RUNCIMAN of Crail.

Markers signifying specific lines:

It is assumed that those markers differing from the mode and occurring only on one line, are indicative of that particular lineage.

With 4 matching participants now we can surmise that:

marker 481 = 25 signifies the subset of descendants of David & Janet (LOCKIE) RUNCIMAN

and

marker 442 = 11 signifies a descendant of William of Crail & Elizabeth (JAMIESON) RUNCIMAN's grandson William (marr. Jean COCKBURN)

and

marker 464d = 16 signifies a descendant of William of Crail & Elizabeth (JAMIESON) RUNCIMAN's grandson John (marr. Isabel COMB)

The earlier assimption that marker 481 = 24 signifies a descendant of William & Mary (BROWN) RUNCIMAN should now be taken in the context of this looking like a modal value for Lineage 1.

In addition, see the dna signature charts for George and Jennet (FINLAY) RUNCIMAN.  and for William of Crail

 

Lineage 1 Genetic Distances (GD)

See the World Families Network FAIRBAIRN Discussion Pages for Genetic Distance and Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA) tables (which may lag behind in updates).